UNITED STATES

Joel was down from Boston with a few of his heavily accented friends and fellow members of the National Association of Government Employees sent by the Kamala Harris campaign to shore up support in Pennsylvania.Even they know, things are not going well for her.”I don’t know why she can’t answer questions,” Joel told me, in what was about the most blunt assessment against one’s own interest I’d heard in months.I think a lot of people on all sides are confused by this.As a guy born and raised in Philly who lived for two decades in New York, I felt it my duty to explain, in a good-natured way, to the fellas why I hate Boston. After all, it’s a treasured ritual of the Northeast. With that out of the way, Stanley, who appeared to be the group’s leader, had another explanation for Kamala’s woes.”She’s only been in the race three months, she’s barely out of the gate. That’s a lot to ask.”Billionaire mogul Mark Cuban echoed that in an X post, “Think of it this way,” he mused, “a candidate that started only 13 weeks ago, is now, worst case scenario, in a dead heat with a former president.”Aside from being bad at imagining the worst-case scenario, what we see from Mr. Cuban is the beginning of the excuses for a Harris loss. But as the playwright David Mamet once wrote, “your excuses are your own.”I was thinking about all of this Friday as I wandered around Scranton under beautiful skies and amid old stone monuments to America’s greatness. At one point, and my hand to God, I’m not making this up, I found myself literally on Biden Street. Biden street. That Biden. I bring this up because there were sirens blaring and flashing lights as cops shut down traffic. “The drivers are annoyed,” I heard one cop say, “maybe they’ll remember it was a Democrat who did this on Election day.”A guy comes up to me and says, “why’d they shut down traffic?” “Tim Walz is in town,” I explained.”Time Walsh?” he asked.”No, Tim Walz.””Who?”With a gentle sigh, I said, “It doesn’t matter.”And it struck me, the Democrats passed on a guy who literally has a street named after him in Scranton for Kamala Harris and a goofy sitcom dad nobody knows.Joel and Stanley are good dudes, stand-up guys who love the country and just disagree with me about who is best to serve it. Even if they are Patriots fans. There is nothing wrong with them organizing as employees to fight for the future they want. That’s America.But I didn’t leave convinced Harris is who they really want.CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION”I didn’t like how it went down,” Joel told me, regarding the ousting of Joe Biden from the race. And he meant it. I often say that polls don’t have faces, people do, and I could see it in his eyes.When I asked Stanley why he supports Harris, not why he doesn’t support Trump, but why Harris, he said, “Why can’t I say why I don’t want Trump?”And he can, and he did, but I think even he knew it was an evasion.The biggest misconception about American politics is that it’s all an algebra equation, even when the polls are wrong over and over. It’s not math, it’s a story, and Kamala Harris isn’t telling one beyond her middle-class upbringing. “I don’t know why she can’t answer questions,” Joel said, and yeah, he had a point.Harris still has a chance to become the president of the United States, but before that can happen she has to answer one simple question: “Why you?”CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM DAVID MARCUS



Source link : https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/david-marcus-scranton-even-kamalas-paid-union-supporters-see-writing-wall

Author :

Publish date : 2024-10-26 13:40:35

Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source.

Former President Trump taped “The Joe Rogan Experience” podcast for nearly three hours on Friday. The podcast, recorded in Austin, Texas, afforded the Republican presidential nominee exposure to Rogan’s 14.5 million followers on Spotify and 17.6 million followers on YouTube. Rogan, the nation’s most-listened-to podcast host, is extremely influential with young male voters, who Trump is aiming to reach. Here are the top takeaways from the podcast that aired on Friday. While explaining the process of choosing political nominations once he got into office, Trump discussed his initial appointment of John Bolton, who served as White House National Security adviser. In 2019, Trump fired Bolton, who remains a staunch critic. Trump described how Phil Ruffin, a fellow American businessman, warned him that Bolton was a “bad guy,” but by then, Trump had already hired him. “And he was right. But he was good in a certain way. He’s a nut job. And every time I had to deal with a country when they saw this whack job standing behind me, they said, ‘Man, Trump’s going to go to war with us.’ He was with Bush when they went stupidly into the Middle East. They should have never done it. I used to say it as a civilian, so I always got more publicity than other people,” Trump said. “It wasn’t like I was trying,” Trump said. “In fact, I don’t know exactly why. Maybe you can tell me.” “I could definitely tell you,” Rogan offered. “You said a lot of wild s—. … And then CNN in all their brilliance by highlighting your wild s— made you much more popular. And they boost you in the polls because people were tired of someone talking in this bulls— pre-prepared politician lingo. And even if they didn’t agree with you, they at least knew whoever that guy is, that’s him. That’s really him.” “The rebels are Republicans now, though, like you want to be invisible, you want to be punk rock, you want to like, buck the system? You’re a conservative now,” Rogan said. “That’s how crazy. And then the liberals are now pro-silencing criticism. They’re pro-censorship online. … [T]hey come in regulating free speech and now regulating the First Amendment. It’s bananas to watch.” Elon Musk, who took over Twitter — now X — in 2022, responded to the clip, writing, “Exactly.” 

“You know they come after their political opponent,” Trump told Rogan in response. “I’ve been investigated more than Alfonse Capone.” In his meeting with former President Obama during the presidential transition period, Trump recalled, “Obama thought we were going to go to war with North Korea.” Rogan then referenced how Trump dubbed North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un “Little Rocket Man” early on in his first term. “I said, ‘Little Rocket Man, you’re going to burn in hell.’ And it was rough,” Trump said. “I got to know him better than anybody, anybody. And I said, ‘Do you ever do anything else? Why don’t you go take it easy and relax? Go to the beach?’ You know, kiddingly, I said, ‘You’re always building nuclear. Just relax. You don’t have to do it. Let’s build some condos.'”
Rogan praised Trump for partnering with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to “Make America Healthy Again” and asked the Republican nominee if he would completely commit to having Kennedy as part of his administration. 

“Oh, I am, but the only thing I want to be a little careful about with him is the environmental. Because, you know, he doesn’t like oil. I love oil,” Trump said. “I think just keep him out of the fire. So I’m going to keep him out of a little bit. I said focus on health. Focus. You could do whatever you want, but, I got to be a little bit careful with the liquid gold.” 

Rogan, showing Trump charts, referenced how “there are chemicals and ingredients in our food that are illegal in other countries because they’ve been shown to be toxic.” 

“There’s pesticides and herbicides, and there’s a lot of sh– that’s been sprayed on our food that really is unnecessary,” the podcaster said. “And there’s a lot of health consequences.” Rogan added that Kennedy recently told him that “more than 70% of young men are ineligible for the military because of their health.” 

“But RFK is going to be – you know I think he’s a great guy,” Trump said. 

Rogan also asked if Trump faced pressure not to work with Kennedy. 

“But I would say that the Big Pharma wasn’t thrilled when they heard that,” Trump said. “I’ve actually always gotten along very well with him. I’ve known him a long time. He’s a different kind of a guy. He’s very smart, great guy, and he’s very sincere about this. I mean, he really is. You know, he thinks we spend a fortune on pesticides and all this stuff, and then you end up at that chart is a terrible shot.” 
 



Source link : https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-appeared-joe-rogans-podcast-nearly-3-hours-here-top-moments

Author :

Publish date : 2024-10-26 12:28:02

Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source.

U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres is once again under fire for not speaking out against Francesca Albanese, the controversial U.N. special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories, who has been condemned for being antisemitic.Albanese is traveling to the U.S. to present her latest report, “Genocide as colonial erasure,” before the Third Committee of the U.N. General Assembly, which oversees social, humanitarian and cultural issues. Albanese’s report, now widely circulated among member state representatives, shows “the masks are off,” according to Anne Bayefsky, president of Human Rights Voices and director of the Touro University Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust.”Albanese’s target is the destruction of the Jewish state, period,” Bayefsky said, claiming Albanese’s report is “a new, unhinged rant — translated, reproduced and spread across the world by the United Nations — utterly ignorant of regional and religious history.BIDEN-HARRIS ENVOY ACCUSED OF PRESSURING ISRAELI LAWMAKERS TO DROP BILL BANNING TERROR-LINKED UN AGENCY”[Albanese] claims the Jewish people are colonists in Israel and have been engaged in a genocidal killing spree as part of ‘a century-long project.’ It would be laughable, if her hate-mongering and incitement to violence were not so deadly.”Danny Danon, Israel’s ambassador to the U.N., told Fox News Digital Albanese “failed in her role as special rapporteur for the U.N. She has no interest in the welfare of Israelis or ordinary Gazans but has instead shown to favor spreading hate. Time and again, she has succeeded in continuing to peddle dangerous antisemitic tropes and openly supporting the Hamas terrorists occupying Gaza.” He also had a warning to U.S. colleges, saying Albanese’s “latest reports show how deep her antisemitism runs,” adding she “should not be allowed near any educational institutions where she can spread her vicious antisemitism under the flag of the U.N.” On Oct. 17, Albanese retweeted a diatribe that accused the Jewish state of “blood lust,” calling it a “must-read for the ages.” Accompanying the article was a cartoon featuring a person in a respirator and hazmat suit bearing the Israeli flag and an American flag lapel pin with bloodied hands giving two thumbs up. Bayefsky said the image is “classic antisemitism.” Fox News Digital asked Farhan Haq, deputy spokesman for U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres, whether the secretary-general could censure Albanese for her antisemitic commentary and whether Guterres believes Albanese is acting in accordance with the U.N. Code of Conduct. Haq said “on principle” Guterres does not “comment on rapporteurs” and has no authority to terminate Albanese or reduce her salary. Asked about her antisemitic remarks, Haq said the U.N. Chief “is firmly opposed to antisemitism, from anyone.”Albanese’s critics say she is not abiding by the U.N. Code of Conduct for special procedures mandate holders of the Human Rights Councils, which states that “all human rights must be treated in a fair and equal manner,” and that mandate holders must “uphold the highest standards of … probity, impartiality, equity, honesty and good faith.”ISRAEL BANS UN SECRETARY-GENERAL OVER ANTI-ISRAEL ACTIONS: ‘DOESN’T DESERVE TO SET FOOT ON ISRAELI SOIL’Pascal Sim, U.N. Human Rights Council spokesperson, was asked by Fox News Digital whether the council might censure Albanese for her conduct and antisemitism or relieve her of her position. Sim said “the positions of the Human Rights Council are expressed in the decisions, resolutions and presidential statements its 47 member states adopt at the end of each of its sessions.” He further explained that “as of now, I have no information about what the council may or may not do regarding any special procedures mandate holders beyond what was recently decided at the just concluded 57th session.”Bayefsky said the failure to address Albanese’s conduct is infuriating. “In one more scandal, U.N. Secretary-General Guterres is bending over backwards to protect Albanese rather than her victims,” Bayefsky said.Bayefsky said “absolutely nothing would prevent him from denouncing her antisemitic behavior, calling for her dismissal and submitting the case of her flagrant violation of U.N. codes of conduct to his own U.N. office of legal affairs for next steps.”Albanese did not respond to Fox News Digital’s requests for comment about allegations of antisemitism. Albanese tweeted Oct. 24 that she was “disappointed” by “spurious, recycled allegations against me,” and she claimed to be “profoundly committed to human rights for all people.” UKRAINE, OTHERS FURIOUS AT UN CHIEF FOR MEETING PUTIN AT BRICS SUMMITHillel Neuer, executive director of United Nations Watch, replied to her on X, claiming, “When we brought to the U.N. victims from Iran, China, Russia, Syria, & North Korea, you never said a word for them.”ISRAELI WOMAN BRAVELY DESCRIBES HORROR AS HAMAS HOSTAGE: ‘THEY WERE TAKING PLEASURE IN HURTING ME’Asked whether Albanese’s antisemitic statements are a concern as she prepares to tour U.S. colleges, a State Department spokesperson told Fox News Digital “the U.S. firmly concludes that [Albanese] is unfit for her role or any role in the United Nations. Our commitment to upholding human rights for all is unwavering, and we will continue to stand against antisemitism.”  The spokesperson also described how U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Linda Thomas-Greenfield, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Human Rights Council Michèle Taylor and U.S. Special Envoy on Antisemitism Deborah Lipstadt have recently expressed “strong disapproval” of Albanese.Statements posted on X by both U.S. ambassadors condemned Albanese’s antisemitism. Thomas-Greenfield wrote in part on X that, “There is no place for antisemitism from U.N. affiliated officials tasked with human rights,” while the U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Human Rights Council, Michèle Taylor, called the U.N. official’s words when comparing Israel’s prime minister to Hitler as, “Reprehensible and antisemitic.”Fox News Digital also asked whether the State Department intended to block Albanese’s travel or restrict her movements to the immediate vicinity around the U.N., an action it has previously taken with unfriendly foreign diplomats traveling on United Nations business. A State Department spokesperson said the department could not comment given that “visa records are confidential under U.S. law.”Bayefsky condemned the State Department’s refusal to limit Albanese’s travel, given that she “is in the business of promoting, spreading and inciting violent antisemitism. The State Department is supposed to be in the business of protecting Jewish Americans from the inflammatory hatred of an international visitor. “The United States is certainly under no obligation, as the U.N. host country, to facilitate her travel outside the U.N. as part of her treacherous effort to reach American campuses. If the State Department refuses to do its job and limit her visa accordingly, then they are aiding and abetting the spread of antisemitism across America.”The Anti-Defamation League reported that Albanese’s college tour would include visits to Georgetown University, Barnard College and Princeton. She is also reportedly due to speak at John Jay College in New York City during her U.S. visit.



Source link : https://www.foxnews.com/world/un-secretary-general-wont-condemn-official-accused-antisemitism-us-said-grant-visa-visit

Author :

Publish date : 2024-10-26 11:00:30

Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source.

With 10 days until Election Day, two new major national polls indicate Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Trump are in a dead heat in the race to succeed President Biden in the White House.With the clock quickly ticking, the two nominees and their running mates are fanning out across the key battleground states this weekend.Trump starts Saturday with a rally in Novi, Michigan, in suburban Detroit. Later in the day, he’ll campaign in another of the crucial swing states — Pennsylvania — as he holds a rally in State College, home to Penn State University.CHECK OUT THE LATEST FOX NEWS POWER RANKINGS IN THE 2024 ELECTIONSen. JD Vance of Ohio, the Republican vice presidential nominee, starts his day in Atlanta before holding campaign events in Erie and Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.Top Trump surrogates Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who ended his long-shot White House run and endorsed Trump, and former Democratic presidential candidate and former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, who days ago switched from an independent to a Republican, will team up for Trump in swing state North Carolina. And Elon Musk, the Tesla and Space X magnate who’s the world’s richest person, stumps for Trump in Pennsylvania.POLITICAL ROCK STARS AND ENTERTAINMENT CELEBRITIES HIT THE CAMPAIGN TRAILHarris on Saturday will team up with former first lady Michelle Obama, arguably the most popular Democrat in the country, at a get-out-the-vote rally in Kalamazoo, Michigan. The stop comes two days after the vice president shared the stage in suburban Atlanta with former President Obama.Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, the Democratic vice presidential nominee, makes two stops in battleground Arizona Saturday, first in Window Rock and later in Phoenix.In a sign of just how important a role Pennsylvania is playing with its 19 electoral votes up for grabs, first lady Jill Biden campaigns for Harris in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, while progressive champion Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, a two-time runner-up for the Democratic nomination, stumps for Harris in Erie.On Sunday, Harris is scheduled to make multiple retail stops in Philadelphia. Trump will hold a rally at Madison Square Garden in New York City, the media capital of the world.Trump’s campaign says the former president, who has long wanted to hold a rally in the legendary New York City venue, will frame his closing argument during the rally. And the campaign will hold a backstage fundraiser for major donors with top-tier access costing $924,600.It can’t get any closer than this.Two major national polls conducted Sunday through Wednesday and released Friday indicate Harris and Trump in a dead heat.Grabbing headlines first is a New York Times/Siena College survey indicating the Democratic Party and GOP presidential nominees are tied at 48%. That’s a switch from a previous poll, earlier this month, when Harris held a slight three-point edge.A CNN survey had the candidates deadlocked at 47% among likely voters nationwide. Its previous poll from late September indicated the vice president had a razor-thin one-point margin.There were warning signs in the two surveys for both candidates, however. Harris lost her favorability advantage over Trump in both polls.After replacing President Biden atop the Democrats’ 2024 ticket in July, the vice president’s favorable ratings soared. But they’ve steadily eroded over the past month.Another red flag for Harris are polls indicating her support among Black voters is below Biden’s levels in the 2020 election.For Trump, his support among White voters is on par with his standing in the 2020 election, when he lost the White House to Biden.And the former president still faces a healthy deficit to the vice president when it comes to being trustworthy and caring about people.While national polls are closely watched, the race for the White House is not based on the national popular vote. It’s a battle for the states and their electoral votes.FROM ‘JOYFUL WARRIOR’ TO CALLING TRUMP A ‘FACIST,’ KAMALA HARRIS CHANGES HER MESSAGING IN THE FINAL STRETCHAnd the latest surveys in the seven crucial battleground states whose razor-thin margins decided Biden’s 2020 victory over Trump and will likely determine whether Harris or Trump wins the 2024 election, are mostly within the margin of error.The latest Fox News national poll indicated Trump had a two-point edge, but Harris had a 6-point advantage among respondents questioned in all seven battleground states.While there’s a margin of error in the polls, there is a clear frontrunner in the battle for campaign cash, another important indicator in presidential politics. And it’s Harris.According to the latest figures the two major party presidential campaigns filed with the Federal Election Commission, Harris hauled in $97 million during the first half of October.That far outpaced the $16 million the Trump campaign said it raised during the first half of this month.Both campaigns use a number of affiliated fundraisings committees to raise money. And when those are included, Trump narrowed the gap, but trailed $176 million to $97 million during the first two weeks of this month.The new filings also spotlight that the Harris campaign continues to vastly outspend the Trump campaign. During the first 16 days of October, the Democratic presidential nominee’s campaign outspent Trump $166 million to $99 million, with paid media the top expenditure for both campaigns.However, Harris finished the reporting period with more cash in her coffers. As of Oct. 16, she had $119 million cash on hand, while Trump had $36 million. When joint fundraising committees are also included, Harris holds a $240 million to $168 million cash-on-hand advantage.Get the latest updates from the 2024 campaign trail, exclusive interviews and more at our Fox News Digital election hub.



Source link : https://www.foxnews.com/politics/harris-trump-presidential-showdown-dead-even-10-days-until-election-day

Author :

Publish date : 2024-10-26 08:00:49

Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source.

Martha Stewart revealed that she shared a kiss with a stranger at a cathedral while she was on her honeymoon with her now ex-husband Andrew Stewart. In the upcoming Netflix documentary “Martha,” the 83-year-old lifestyle maven recalled that she and Andrew, who tied the knot in 1961, decided to embark on a five-month extended honeymoon in Europe after their nuptials. During an on-camera interview with director R.J. Cutler, Stewart remembered that the former couple arrived in Florence, Italy, on the night before Easter. The TV personality explained that she visited the famed Duomo Florence Cathedral solo while Andrew stayed back in their hotel room.”He didn’t have any interest in going to the Duomo with me,” Stewart said of her former spouse. “Listening to that amazing music in the cathedral… It was a very romantic place, crowded with tourists, and I met this very handsome guy.”She continued, “He didn’t know I was married. I was this waif of a girl hanging out in the cathedral on Easter Eve. He was emotional. I was emotional. It’s just because it was an emotional place. It was unlike anything I had ever experienced. An expansive dome. So beautiful and paintings all around you.”MARTHA STEWART ADMITS SHE HAD AN AFFAIR DURING MARRIAGE BUT EX ‘NEVER KNEW ABOUT’ IT”It was like nothing I had ever done before,” Stewart added. “And so why not kiss a stranger?””Were you being, you know, what’s the word I’m looking for?” Cutler asked.”Naughty?” Stewart replied.”Was it naughty or was it infidelity?” the director asked.”Neither,” Stewart said. “It was neither naughty nor unfaithful. It was just emotional of the moment. That’s how I looked at it. And it was exciting because, I mean, it was a very emotional place. I wish we could all experience such an evening.”Stewart and Andrew met in 1960 after his sister set them up on a blind date. At the time, she was attending Barnard College in New York City, and he was a 23-year-old student at Yale Law School. In the documentary, Stewart, who was raised by a middle-class family in Nutley, New Jersey, recalled that she was impressed when Andrew picked her up for their first date in a yellow Mercedes sedan.”I had never been in a Mercedes before,” she said. “We went out to dinner. He was very polite and handsome, and he had traveled a lot. It was exciting to me — a sophisticated young man. And he had an American Express card, which was a very big deal in those days. And he was just intriguing and playful and nice. By the end of dinner, I was madly in love.”Stewart recalled that she visited Andrew every weekend while he was studying at Yale, and she had never slept with a man before her future husband. The two tied the knot after a year of dating. While speaking to Cutler, Stewart remembered that she was amazed by the sights and cuisine in Europe and dreaded their return to New York City after their honeymoon.”I was 19 years old and I didn’t want to go home,” Stewart explained. “We got back to New York and reality came crashing down.”Stewart and the publisher welcomed their only child, daughter Alexis, in 1965. In the documentary, the businesswoman admitted that she initially had mixed feelings about motherhood. “Back then, everybody was having babies so young,” Stewart said. “That was sort of like the style and I thought it was a natural thing. And it turns out it’s not at all natural to be a mother.”Andrew and Stewart separated in 1987 and officially filed for divorce in 1990. In an interview with Cutler during the documentary, Stewart recalled that Andrew had numerous affairs during their marriage and revealed that she had also been unfaithful to him.”He was not satisfied at home,” Stewart said of Andrew. “I don’t know how many different girlfriends he had during this time, but I think there were quite a few.””Young women, listen to my advice, if you’re married and your husband starts to cheat on you, he’s a piece of s—,” she said. “Get out of that marriage.””But I couldn’t do that. I couldn’t walk away,” she admitted.”Didn’t you have an affair early on in the relationship?” Cutler asked.”Yeah, but I don’t think Andy ever knew about that,” Stewart answered. “He did say he knew about it,” Cutler said.”He did?” Martha asked.”Yes, you had confessed to him,” Cutler replied. “He says he didn’t stray from the marriage until you told him you had already strayed.””Oh, that’s not true. I don’t think,” Stewart responded.”But what happened?” Cutler asked. “You had an affair.””I had a very brief affair with a very attractive Irishman,” Stewart shared. “And it was just nothing. It was nothing. In terms of— it would never have broken up a marriage. I would never have broken up a marriage for it.””It was nothing,” she reiterated. “Nothing. It was like the kiss in the cathedral.”LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSIn “Martha,” Stewart also accused Andrew of cheating on her with her former assistant Robyn Fairclough. “Robyn worked for me and she had lost her apartment or something,” she recalled. Stewart said that she told Fairclough that she could move into a barn on the property that the cookbook author shared with Andrew.MARTHA STEWART ADMITS SHE HAD AN AFFAIR DURING MARRIAGE BUT EX ‘NEVER KNEW ABOUT’ IT”When I was traveling, Andy started up with her,” Stewart said. “It was like I put out a snack for Andy.”When asked if she confronted Fairclough, Stewart confirmed that she did and “kicked her out immediately.””You know, what the hell are you doing? Andy betrayed me. Right on our property,” Stewart said.”Not nice,” she added.Three years after his divorce from Martha, Andrew married Fairclough, who was 21 years his junior, in May 1993. However, they later divorced. Andrew is currently married to Shyla Stewart. Shyla is the president and CEO of the publishing company Fieldstone Publishing, while Andrew is its Publisher Emeritus, according to the business’s website. The couple share five children, per People magazine.Fox News Digital has reached out to a representative for Andrew for comment.CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTERStewart has not remarried, though she was in an on-and off-relationship with billionaire Charles Simonyi for 15 years until they split in 2008. During a 2022 episode of “The Ellen DeGeneres Show,” Stewart revealed that she previously dated Anthony Hopkins but broke up with him because she “couldn’t stop thinking of him as Hannibal Lecter.”Hopkins played serial killer Hannibal Lecter in the 1991 horror thriller “The Silence of the Lambs” and won an Academy Award for his performance.In a recent interview with People magazine, Stewart revealed that she and Andrew have not spoken in two decades.”I haven’t talked to him for over 20 years,” she told the outlet. “Sadly.””Martha” will be available to stream on Netflix on Wednesday.



Source link : https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/martha-stewart-admits-kissed-stranger-during-honeymoon

Author :

Publish date : 2024-10-26 08:41:46

Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source.